(Short) Information wants to be free

17 11 2009

Harper’s Magazine senior editor Bill Wasik says short information will always be free.

He’s probably right, but let’s be honest. He has an agenda to say so.

Short information (newspapers, blogs, short video, etc.) is taking away readers from long prose publications publishing online, like Harper’s, that want to differentiate from short information and monetize. Wasik says that Kindle is an amazing device because it provides a new model for long information (Magazines, journals, books, etc.) Short, amateur information isn’t accessible on Kindle, so editors of publications love it because they don’t have to compete with the novelty content that they’re losing to on the Web.

Wasik says there hasn’t been a profitable business model for short content. So long as the majority of short information is produced by amateurs, there won’t be. He speculates that “some of these companies” that host short content “will fail” and create scarcity for the consumer, which may create a value proposition. If he means newspapers publishing online, he’s right. If he means that YouTube and Vimeo and Blogger will fail, he’s wrong. The barriers to creation and publication online are long gone, so people will continue to create short information on those sites, or any other sites that cater to them.

Some long information is also available for free on the Web (Google Books, NY Times Magazine) and that will perpetuate the free model for short content, too. Short information is free because, in large part, people who create that information want it to be free. I know that in America we typically want to monetize everything, but the last couple years have shown that people have other immediate motivators (exposure, notoriety, peer responses) to create. As amateurs continue to create competitive content and offer it for free, the public will accept no higher price.





Draft 2: Twitter book wine chapter

10 08 2009

Chapter x: Wineries Like the Taste of Twitter

“Wine is inherently social so it’s really well-suited for social media, for Twitter,” says Rick Bakas, director of social media marketing at St. Supery Vineyards and Winery in Napa Valley, California. Bakas refers to the timeless tradition, across centuries and cultures, of convening around food and wine to socialize. Twitter provides a virtual roundtable where wine enthusiasts can meet and talk wine.

How many characters does it take to describe tasting a wine? How many characters does it take to recommend a wine? More and more people are finding it takes fewer than 140, and thus more wineries are surfacing on Twitter.

This chapter will explore how wineries came to find Twitter, their experiences, practices and measurement for using the platform. It will also identify two case studies documenting best uses of Twitter. We will make these findings through the stories of the following wineries:

•    Eagles Nest Winery (@eaglesnestwine)
•    St. Supery Vineyards and Winery (@stsupery)
•    Sobon Family Wines (@sobonwine)
•    Donati Family Vineyard (@donatifamily)
•    King Estate Winery (@kingestate)
•    Capozzi Winery (@pinotblogger)

Read the rest of this entry »





Finally, the term project is complete!

19 03 2009

Find it here: The Dischord of U.S. Copyright Law, Music and Technology.





(Remote) Control and the ego

16 02 2009

Rosen, C. (Fall 2004/Winter 2005). The Age of Egocasting. The New Atlantis, Number 7. 51-72. Retrieved February 15, 2009 from http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-age-of-egocasting.

In her article for The New Atlantis, “The Age of Egocasting,” Christine Rosen reviews a recent history of technologies that have made media consumption more convenient and personal — too a fault. “By giving us the illusion of perfect control, these technologies risk making us incapable of ever being surprised,” she says. “They encourage not the cultivation of taste, but the numbing repetition of fetish.” The technologies Rosen refers to, includes:

The remote control: Zenith engineer Robert Adler said in his remote control patent: “It is highly desirable to provide a system to regulate the receiver operation without requiring the observer to leave the normal viewing position.” Basically, if people could chose to be immobile while enjoying entertainment, they would. The remote control was the birth of mainstream entertainment convenience.

DVRs: DVRs (like TiVo) have given us even greater control over television viewing than the remote because we can now choose our programming. Only 4 percent of homes had DVRs when Rosen’s article was published in 2004. According to a Nielsen report, 27 percent of all U.S. households have DVRs as of November 2008. For the week of January 5-11, 2009, ABC’s Grey’s Anatomy had the largest audience via DVR viewing with 4.6 million viewers via DVRs. The adoption rate is growing and DVRs are quickly becoming mainstream.

Digital music players: Popularized by the iPod, digital music players have delivered on giving people choice for music entertainment. Whereas cassette players before them allowed people to create “mixtapes” to customize the order in which they played music, digital music players enable instant gratification by enabling instant access to a library only limited to the size of the lister’s music library. Rosen cited price to be a barrier to adoption when she wrote the article, but Apple sold more than 11 million iPods in its fourth quarter of 2008. Combine that with the notion of steady competition at lower price points than iPods, and it’s easy to see that digital music players have become a common entertainment technology.

All of these technologies follow the same trend: Choice is king.

And people want to crown themselves with control over their content. Rosen calls this egocasting — “a world where we exercise an unparalleled degree of control over what we watch and what we hear.” Whereas this freedom to choose what and when we want to consume media could be seen as positive, Rosen takes a more negative approach, calling it “selective avoidance.” She makes the point that if we are too fragmented and narrow in our choices, we have less opportunity to be exposed to other points of view are a therefore less informed public.

What is the next mainstream technology that will bring choice and convenience, perhaps to a fault? I’d argue the smartphone.

Most people today are already used to carrying at most three items with them: keys, a “dumb” phone and wallet (or purse). The smartphone can be all of these. New cars are already keyless. It’s only a matter of time before homes are. With Internet access on a smartphone, you soon will be able to complete any banking transaction you could with a credit card, and probably more. Lastly, smartphones are innately communication technologies, and on most of today’s phone people have access to some combination of voice, VOIP, SMS, MMS, IM and email.

If people are so enamored by nearly unlimited music or video selections of a digital media player today, then that should play to the success of smartphones, because they have multimedia capabilities, too. The only thing I can think of that a smartphone can’t do today is, ironically, be a TV remote control.

Questions for class:

  • What other technologies can you think of have catered to the ego (vs. convenience)? Have they succeeded, failed, or evolved into something different?
  • With regard to remote controls, DVRs and digital media players… Do you own one or all, and how has that changed your media consumption habits? Are those changes positive or negative?

See Robert Adler at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCV4C4AwUj4 (This video can not be embedded.)

  • At 18:00 “How was the remote control first received by the public?”
  • At 25:00 “What will become of the remote control?”

Slides:

Sources:

Apple reports fourth quarter results. (October 21, 2008). Retrieved on February 15, 2009 from http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/10/21results.html.

Goetzl, D. (November 4, 2008). DVR Usage Tops 30% In Major Markets. Media Daily News. Retrieved on February 15, 2009 from http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=94130.

Gorman, B. (January 6, 2009). Grey’s Anatomy has most DVR viewers, 90210 has greatest share of viewing by DVR. TV by the Numbers. Retrieved on February 15, 2009 from http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/26/greys-anatomy-has-most-dvr-viewers-90210-has-greatest-share-of-viewing-by-dvr/11582.





Hello world!

1 07 2008

Ready or not, here I study!